Light rail alternatives should be examined - The Reflector: Opinion


Light rail alternatives should be examined

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:00 am

The Columbia River Crossing project has become mired in political division and conflicts with air and river traffic. We need to back off and take another look at what may be possible now.

In the past, we were corrected in thinking the I-205 Glenn Jackson Bridge was originally designed for light rail. Still, it should be a simple matter to determine if there is a way to retrofit that bridge for light rail now. It appears far less expensive to retrofit a modern bridge now and deal with the essential I-5 bridge replacement when we have budgetary and political breathing room.

Light rail following the I-205 corridor would by appearances be easier to build, manage, and have more potential ridership than running it to and through already congested West Vancouver. It would be far more centralized, so far more Clark County citizens could share its benefits. It would also take at least as much traffic off our interstate system.

© 2016 The Reflector. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
  • 2 Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard