Students at Maple Grove Elementary School in Battle Ground say goodbye to their parents before beginning their first day of school in September 2018. The start of the school year had been delayed by 12 days due to a strike. 

Battle Ground Public Schools is looking to cut the equivalent of dozens of positions as a result of a significant drop in student enrollment expected next school year.

On April 22, BGPS Board of Directors voted unanimously to approve a resolution authorizing for the reduction of staff adding up to about 44 full-time-equivalent (FTE) positions. The reduction was anticipated to result in about $3 million in savings for the district as it looks at about an $8 million shortfall, according to district officials.

Though the final budget for the 2019-2020 school year won’t be approved until this summer, BGPS Superintendent Mark Ross said projections had the district with $8 million it needed to make up for a balanced budget. Part of that decrease related to projections of a drop in enrollment — he said next year there was a drop of nearly 500 students expected.

According to the latest statistics available on the state Office of the Superintendent for Public Instruction’s website, BGPS had an enrollment of about 13,550 students this time last year. Ross said for the coming school year the district anticipated being under 13,000 students.

BGPS Spokesperson Rita Sanders said that other districts were also seeing enrollment declines, mentioning Vancouver and Evergreen specifically. She pointed to generational differences of current young adults postponing or deciding not to have children as well as alternatives such as online school as contributing to such declines.

Alongside the $3 million reductions from staffing cuts, other cuts included close to $4 million in contractual and professional services and $4.2 million in cuts to materials and supplies, according to a budget projection presented to the board.

Sanders noted that with potential changes in funding as a result of the recently-adjourned state legislative session the final budget would likely change. She said most of that reduction of 44 FTE’s would be from retirements and resignations — as of May 1 the district was expecting that 13 staff would be cut.

“But that’s changing weekly,” Sanders remarked. Ross said that contractually the final number of staff laid off would be final May 15.

Staff reductions were across the board. At Battle Ground high schools specifically, Ross said staffing is a challenge given the specific kind of certifications those teachers have, whereas teachers at the primary level had more general ones.

“We’re not cutting any programs,” Ross said, though he noted that the frequency of those offerings might be reduced. 

Though increased labor costs, such as the approved increase of teacher salaries at the start of the school year, factored in somewhat, Sanders said enrollment was still the biggest driver for the staffing cuts.

“There’s a lot of maneuvering and figuring and we’re really trying to make sure if we can if there’s a possibility to get as many people in a position as possible,” Ross remarked.

“It’s never easy to, if it comes down to it, to lose people,” Ross said. “(But) it’s our responsibility to make sure that we are using the dollars that we get from out public wisely and efficiently.”

Recommended for you

(4) comments


Watch the 44 or so folks who lose their jobs be conservative leaning people. It seems to be the trend these days in our local government to seek out and punish folks who lean right of center. I hope that won't be the case here, but fear it will be as we begin to see more and more widespread political discrimination happening in our society.


$8,000,000 budget divided by 13,550 students equals a per student FTE staff cost of $590.41?


All school districts carry more personnel than the state pays for. Until the recent levy changes those extra positions were paid for out of levy's. That's supposed to be prohibited now. At one point BG had ~28-30% of their positions paid for through the levy (highest in Clark County). Add declining enrollment in spite of the housing construction and something has to give. The open question: How many positions should have been cut? It appears they are taking $2.5 million out of the reserve fund to cover some of the extra staff in hopes that the enrollment situation will get better or that they can find another way to raise more money. Biting the bullet now would likely have raised that "44" RiF to ~80 positions. If the Board guessed wrong then in another year there may need to be more cuts.

Rita Sanders

Hi Bdad,
I can share additional information about the use of levy funds. School districts can use levy funds to pay for enrichment of basic education programs, or "enhancements." One of the enhancements defined in the law is staffing that goes above and beyond what the state provides for basic education as allocated by the prototypical school model. That means, for example, that if the state provides funding for 2 school nurses, the district could use levy funds to pay the salaries and benefits of additional nurses. This is outlined in RCW 28A.150.276:
Thank you,
Rita Sanders, BGPS communications

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.